the handmade soap masters

To help save orangutans, several “responsible soapers” suggest that palm oil can still be used, as long as it is ethically produced (i.e., organically certified) and ethically marketed (i.e., distributed through fair trade networks).

It is of course possible to resort to “more ethical” sources for common soapmaking oils such as palm oil, just to mention the one that seems to be winning the title of Most Eco-UnFriendly. It is a sad fact, however, that eco-friendliness, workers’ health and safety, sustainability and other “general good” considerations do not fit in with the business goals of any of the large public companies (corporations) that either produce, or import/export, or distribute, or market, or otherwise handle products and commodities coming from overseas for the retail market.

Given these restraints, choosing organically certified/fair trade palm oil does not guarantee per se a better future, unless one has direct and immediate control on the overseas sources. One example of an authentically more ethical alternative to corporate palm oil (the kind that requires forest destruction and orangutan extinction) is when a group of consumers get together in an informal “buying group (co-operative)”, and appoint a qualified co-ordinator to organise the purchase of ethically grown, organic palm oil directly from the local producers. And yet even in this case, the necessity of transporting the raw material from the production area to the co-ordinator, and then from the co-ordinator to individual members of the buying group, might add unnecessary levels of complexity and misuse of energy resources.

A much better way to improve our options for a saner future, is to choose local products. I have always found it a bit of a mystery how palm oil is considered “indispensable” for soap in a country like Australia, where so many other, just-as-good and locally produced oils are available.

It seems to me that the only sensible explanation for pushing consumption of palm oil, in this context, is that palm oil production can be carried out by the industry players in countries where land costs, workforce costs, environmental and human health costs are so outrageously cheap, that long-distance transport and storage are basically the only costs affecting the final price of the product.

And for large companies that use palm oil as the raw material for consumer goods, this is a fantastically “good deal”, and a good enough reason to invest in the marketing of “more ethical alternatives”.

Palm oil in soap is not needed, and we can all contribute to a better environment if we learn how to do without it.

This entry was posted on Sunday, 18 February 2007 at 4:03 pm and is filed under soap making, sustainability. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.